Three years, two mistrials, and $5-10 million later, five defendants were convicted of plotting to blow up the Sears Tower.  A sixth defendant was acquitted on all charges.  Only one defendant, Narseal Batiste, was convicted on all charges.  The defense attorney intends to file for a new trial within 30 days.
I read the New York Times article on this a few times, and was surprised by the quotes and tone of the story.  I'm not sure if the author was biased, if the legal experts around the case are biased, or if the story is correct in its tone, but I got the impression that the case was an example of overzealous government and prosecutors needing to convict somebody of something.
I'm not sure how to feel about the case.  I'm interested because I can see the Sears Tower out my bedroom window and walk to it in 15 minutes.  However, two mistrials and a split jury on a case that most Americans would walk into with guilty on their lips, makes me curious as to how valid the charges really are.
Elvis has left the building
16 years ago